Image by Max Licher, courtesy of SEINet Arizona-New Mexico Chapter. |
Other materials by Palmer exist elsewhere in the archives, including photographs, maps, and vocabularies. William Safford was himself a US Naval officer who collected for the U.S. National Museum, and some of his photographs were donated to the NAA by his wife. Within the Palmer collection are folders which contain both handwritten notes by Palmer and typewritten duplicates of Palmer's notes by Safford or Archer - sometimes with additional unsigned, handwritten corrections or queries. In the end, at least five individuals contributed content to the collection, representing a confluence of interests, careers, and experiences among many people and across many decades at NMNH. From among this particular multi-vocal tangle emerges K. grandiflora.
Palmer's earliest sample of K. grandiflora still within the NMNH Botany Department holdings comes from the city of Guaymas, Sonora in the year 1887 - Palmer Sample 177(1),(2). Yet Palmer's notes from that year are scant and make no mention of this plant, despite noting the bloom times of chrysanthemum, rose, and tuberose in the region (3). His 1887 specimen of K. grandiflora finally reappears over 60 years later when William Andrew Archer compiled Palmer's collection notes into a series of index cards.
Palmer's earliest sample of K. grandiflora still within the NMNH Botany Department holdings comes from the city of Guaymas, Sonora in the year 1887 - Palmer Sample 177(1),(2). Yet Palmer's notes from that year are scant and make no mention of this plant, despite noting the bloom times of chrysanthemum, rose, and tuberose in the region (3). His 1887 specimen of K. grandiflora finally reappears over 60 years later when William Andrew Archer compiled Palmer's collection notes into a series of index cards.
Notecard for Tribulus grandiflorus, 1887, Edward Palmer Papers 1869-1920, Box 11, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution. |
Notecard for Kallstroemia grandiflora, 1898. Edward Palmer Papers 1869-1920. Box 11, National Anthropological Archives, ,Smithsonian Insitution. |
Much like K. grandiflora, the Edward Palmer Papers reflect the involvement of many agents, not all of whom were working at the same time or on the same projects. The 60+ year gap between Palmer’s trip to Sonora and the creation of Archer’s notecards reflects the fits and stops which characterize scientific discovery, and science within a natural history museum. The collection is a snapshot, or a sample, of some of the ongoing processes in the careers of ethnobotanists, the administrative staff behind them, politics, and infinitely deep ecologies around the globe – all at particular times. Upon being transferred to the NAA the records were re-organized, meaning they are also representative of archival theory in practice.
Together, the NMNH Botany collection and Edward Palmer Papers provide us with two complementary samples. While the dried sample of K. grandiflora can give us structural information on the species, it tells us little about the ecology from which it emerged and can only tell so much about the collector. For instance, Palmer's existing 1887 notes touch on other interests which took up his time: local market offerings, politics, racial ideologies, and a woodpecker pecking on a tin can. Without the archival records we're left with an incomplete picture of how the sample arrived at the Smithsonian and how it fit into Palmer’s complete life in Guaymas. Without Palmer Sample 177, we have no way to experience the materiality and physicality of K. grandiflora in Guaymas 130 years ago. Palmer’s missing notes remind us that no record is complete within itself, which is why interconnected collections – like those found at the Smithsonian Institution – are so invaluable. While this kind of documentary 'trouble' might not be what most researchers hope for, it hints at the complexity of all archival collections and the ways that botanical and archival collections are involved in one another.
Dani Stuchel, Reference Intern
National Anthropological Archives
Sources
(1) "Palmer Sample
177" is only meant to indicate that this was the 177th sample from
Guayamas in 1887, not that it was the 177th sample from Palmer's career or the
year 1887.
(2) Kallstroemia
grandiflora. Catalog number 14164. Botany Department, National Museum of
Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. EZID: http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/363a7966f-bf47-414f-83a9-196d5a305bd8.
(3) Notes on Plants from
Guaymas 1887, Journal Notes 1880-1889, Box 3, Edward Palmer Papers 1869-1920,
National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution.
(4) Notecard for Tribulus
grandifloria, 1887. Box 11. Edward Palmer Papers 1869-1920, National Anthropological
Archives, Smithsonian Institution.
(5) Wolf, M. and B. Evancho. 2016. Plant Guide for
desert globemallow (Sphaeralcea ambigua A. Gray). USDA-NaturalResources
Conservation Service, Tucson Plant Materials Center. Tucson, AZ.
(6) Washington State
University Extension Office. Control de abrojo o cadillo. URL: http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/pdfs/puncturevine_spanish.pdf
(7) O'Neill, Kevin M.
Pollen foraging and pollination, in Solitary Wasps: Behavior and
Natural History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2001.
(8) Notecard for Kallstroemia
grandifloria, 1898. Box 11. Edward Palmer Papers 1869-1920, National Anthropological
Archives, Smithsonian Institution.
No comments:
Post a Comment